One of the open secrets in public education is that it's quite a chore to assess professors in a valid and reliable fashion to assist professional and personal growth. Those outside the field -- that is, usually those with no experience in the class room whatsoever -- have no problem imposing top-down assessments such as pass rate examination and post-course satisfaction surveys, but those usually aren't that helpful in "closing the loop" to elicit meaningful short-term or long-term change. And to be honest, I'm not sure what could be helpful for me as a professor at this point in my nearly-two-decade-long career; for example, peer evaluation is a nice idea, but I'm a full-time department of one, so I don't exactly have peers that do what I do in quality and quantity inside my institution. This means that we're left with things like the course evaluation rankings and comments as the most visible assessments available, and every professor knows that s...